top of page

ACARI | Prostigmata

 

This large and diverse group of mites includes an interesting mixture of species that vary greatly both in terms of size and body form, as well as lifestyle and feeding habits. 

​

Whilst the majority of species you'll be able to find and possibly photograph will have a body size in the region of 0.5-2mm, there are many that are smaller that will go unnoticed. But there are also a few that are certainly bigger, notably members of the Trombidioidea, collectively referred to as 'velvet mites' where some species can grow to 8-10mm, possibly more. 

​

Their general appearance is very variable with the smaller forms typically having an oval or elongate, relatively plain-coloured body, whereas the larger, conspicuous species are generally more bulbous, often wide-shouldered and are usually brightly coloured. They are mostly soft-bodied, weakly sclerotised mites that, in part, are distinguished from mesostigmatans by their legs, as the two pairs at the front are separated from the rear pairs such that there's a distinct gap between pairs II and III, whereas in Mesostigmata pairs II, III and IV are all next to each other. The segments also differ, tending to be quite uniform among the Prostigmata, only narrowing slightly at the joints, and with fused coxae, compared with the more variable, tapering, freely-moving structure seen in Mesostigmata.

 

Although difficult to see, most species have a tracheal system with spiracle openings, known as stigmata, located either near the base of the mouthparts or around the front dorsal edge of the idiosoma, hence the name Prostigmata. They usually, but not always, have eyes and, as noted below, have mouthparts adapted for fluid feeding.

 

I've added some brief notes in respect of the ecology or lifestyle of certain family groups, but I deliberately haven't gone into much detail as I don't have the knowledge, or indeed the space. Most of the species featured here are regarded as soil mites as they are mainly found at ground level in the soil or litter, or under deadwood and stones, but some are arboreal occurring on trees or shrubs, in mosses and lichen or under bark. They're mainly predatory mites that feed on a variety of small arthropods, but there are also plant-feeders and a few fungivores, and even some that exist on waste and decaying organic matter. And then there are the parasitic species that are associated with a wide range of hosts from slugs and snail to various invertebrates, and some animals, and even one particular group that start life as a parasite but then change their feeding habits when they're adults. The list goes on, and similarly with the plant parasites that can cause variable amounts of damage to a wide range of host species, whether harmless leaf discolouration or gall-inducing to being serious pests of commercial crops. And, if that wasn't enough variety, there are also a large number of aquatic species as mentioned below that are not covered.

​

In one way or another, their feeding habits provide nutrition derived from consuming liquid in whatever form it takes and, as such, the mouthparts are variably modified for piecing and sucking, rather than tearing or chewing. Many have the chelicerae fused into a puncturing stylophore, whilst others may have different adaptions for sap-sucking. Accordingly, it's not uncommon to see the Prostigmata referred to as 'sucking mites' thereby retaining the more generic 'predatory and parasitic mites' title for the Mesostigmata fauna.

​

A final observation before starting to look at the various subgroups and families is that most of the more familiar or conspicuous species have common names, such as 'whirligig mites', 'velvet mites', 'spider mites', 'concrete mites', and so on, that can often lead to confusion. I've been careful in my use of these names and have, hopefully, made the correct references where necessary. The more usual collective names, as in 'gall mites' or 'water mites' for example, are better defined and rarely cause a problem.

​

 

The British list includes just over 1000 recognised species that are spread across 70 families, which are rather daunting numbers for a casual observer to get to grips with but, when those families are correctly segregated and broken down, the actual number that are likely to be seen and hopefully photographed becomes far more manageable and a lot easier to understand.

​

The first step is to note that there are four infraorders; Anystides which includes two primary divisions (hyporders), Anystina and Parasitengona; Eleutherengonides, which is also separated into two groups Heterostigmatina and Raphignathina; Eupoides that has no higher-level taxon divisions; and lastly Lapidostommatides, which comprises just one well-sclerotised species. We can now look at each of these subgroups to focus on the superfamilies and families that we need to consider.

​

Anystides - Anystina is a small division comprising just two families, Anystidae as featured below and Hydrovolziidae; whereas Parasitengona is a large group that includes over thirty families as explained in the following superfamily writeups. However, twenty-two of these families that collectively include around 170 species are in the Hydrachnidiae 'water mites' subcohort and, consequently, can be ignored as they don't come under the category of soil mites.

​

Eleutherengonides - without going into detail, I don't think that there's much interest here from a photographer's point of view. I could be wrong, but at the moment I'm only able to feature a single species from the Tetranychidae family.

​

Eupodides - there are fourteen families in this hyporder that are separated into five superfamilies, four of which are covered here to some degree. The Halacaridae family includes around 70 species of 'marine mites' and, as with the Hydrachnidiae,

is excluded.

  

The number of species to consider is now considerably reduced, as are the families and although I'm only able to represent

a few at present, I'm hopeful that in time I'll be able to build on this initial collection. 

​

In a similar format to that used in the other groups, I've followed the systematic (hierarchal alphabetical) listed order - see the final introductory paragraph on the Oribatida page for further information - which, for convenience, are grouped into eight sections:

​

     1) Anystides > Anystina > Anystoidea > Anystidae (family)

     2) Anystides > Parasitengona > Erythraeoidea (superfamily)

     3) Anystides > Parasitengona > Trombidioidea (superfamily)

     4) Eleutherengonides > Raphignathina > Tetranychoidea (superfamily)

     5) Eupodides > Bdelloidea (superfamily)

     6) Eupodides > Eupodoidea (superfamily)

     7) Eupodides > Eryophyoidea (superfamily)

     8) Eupodides > Tydeoidea (superfamily)

​

The associated notes have been compiled from numerous bits of information that I've accumulated during my research, much of which has been extracted from various scientific papers. In all respects I've been careful in making sure that it relates to species that I might be able to find locally. The references made to the number of species within each family is based on the latest information available from the Soil Biodiversity UK website and the current UK Acari Taxonomy list, to which I've kindly been granted access.

​

ACARIFORMES > Trombidiformes > Prostigmata

Anystides > Anystina > Anystoidea > Anystidae

 

The Anystidae includes long-legged, soft-bodied, fast-moving species, that in some larger classification systems are split into two subfamilies Anystinae and Erythracarinae. Only nine validated species have found their way onto the current British list and, although they're not officially placed into subfamilies, they can still be treated as two separate groups. The nine species are placed in four genera; Anystinae > Anystis with four species that have a short, broad idiosoma; and in the Erythracarinae, five species > Chaussieria (2), Erythracarus (2) and Tarsolarcus (1) which have a more elongate appearance as the idiosoma is longer than broad.

   

Unfortunately I'm not able to represent any of the species in the second group and can't find any records or, indeed, much information about them other than Chaussieria maritima is an inter-tidal mite that has been recorded in the South West.

 

The situation with Anystis is much the same as the only publicly available records relate to either the genus or the 'type species' Anystis baccarum. Personally, I can't see how they can be reliably identified from photos and, given there's virtually no information regarding the other species, it's probably a safe bet to assume that all of the individuals featured here are the common and widespread form.

 

Members of the genus are generally described as moderately large (500-1500µm) mites with a broad, but relatively short, almost trapezoidal-shaped body, with a more or less kidney-shaped prodorsal shield, and two pairs of lateral eyes that are located just behind the shield; somewhat variable in colour, but mainly bright orange-red, sometimes darker and occasionally pinkish to yellowish; the legs are longer than the body and of similar length, and are closely attached allowing the mite to change direction very quickly, which has resulted in the common name of 'whirligig mite'. 

​

Anystis cf.baccarum
Anystis cf.baccarum
Anystis cf.baccarum
Anystis cf.baccarum

 

Anystis baccarum is a well-studied species with a detailed updated description but, understandably, with most of the defining characters only identifiable through close inspection. However, there are a couple of features were mentioning. Firstly, the prodorsum is smooth without ornamentation as seen in Anystis salicinus, and with a more distinct kidney-shape that is well rounded anteriorly and indented posteriorly. The shield bears two pairs of long setae and a pair of sensilla. A further pair of sensilla are found on the anterior margin of the idiosoma. The opisthosoma has eight pairs of setae. Some of these features might be visible in photos, but in practice it's very difficult to get well-focused photos with that level of detail of species that are almost constantly on the move.

​

One final bit of information relates to the interesting fact that this particular species apparently has no males and, therefore, reproduction is by parthenogenesis - from the ovum without fertilisation. In gravid females the maturing eggs can often be seen through the outer layer of the body.

​

Anystis cf.baccarum
Anystis cf.baccarum
Anystis cf.baccarum
Anystis cf.baccarum

 

Location / habitat notes: I've seen Anystis in various places including in the garden, but most of the individuals featured here were photographed in wooded areas, mainly at a couple of different broadleaved woodland sites in the New Forest, but also in coniferous woodland in Ringwood Forest. In most cases they were found either under lying deadwood or on fallen trees.

​

ACARIFORMES > Trombidiformes > Prostigmata

Anystides > Parasitengonina > Erythraeoidae

 

The Parasitengonina hyporder (cohort) is a large and diverse assemblage of species that in larger classification systems is split into four primary groups (subcohorts) each containing a variable number of related subfamilies. The British fauna is more limited and doesn't need to be classified to that extent and, as such, we only use the intermediate (subcohort) ranking of Hydrachnidiae for the six 'water mite' superfamilies. The remaining parasitengonine families are placed either in the Erythraeoidea superfamily as represented here, or the Trombidioidea as covered in the following section.

 

The Erythraeoidea includes two families Erythraeidae with near on 40 species in 6 genera, and Smarididae with just two species. I can't find much information regarding most of these species and, although I'll keep an open mind, I'm doubtful that I'll be able to add much more to this section. 

​

Balaustium murorum is a familiar and well-studied species that typically occurs in early spring, appearing on sunny surfaces of mainly man-made concrete and stone structures where it primarily feeds on windblown pollen particles. They are tiny, fast-moving mites, that are easily seen as they have a bright red body. They are found all over the world very often living in temperatures far exceeding those experienced in Britain. Whereas most species would actively avoid direct sunlight, these mites seem to be oblivious to the heat and can often be seen on surfaces that are too hot for human touch. The red pigment protects the mite in some way, but there appears to be different views and opinions.

​

They are commonly known as 'concrete mites' or 'sidewalk mites' depending where you live but if you search the internet, you'll almost certainly find conflicting information as they are regularly misidentified or misnamed as 'clover mites', 'chiggers', 'small velvet mites' or even 'whirligig mites'. The generic term 'little red mites' is also used a lot, as is 'red spider mites', which is particularly misleading as that's the common name for the tiny plant-feeding 'pest' mites in the Tetranychidae family. This type of misinformation has probably resulted in the killing of many of these totally harmless little mites that are regularly found in gardens. They mostly feed on pollen as previously noted, but they are also predators of various tiny arthropods that may actually be 'pest' species.

​

Balaustium murorum

Erythraeidae > Balaustium murorum

Balaustium murorum

Erythraeidae > Balaustium murorum

 

There are a number of species in the wider Palearctic region that are difficult to separate so they are usually treated as groups, Balaustium murorum that may include eight or possibly more species and Balaustium araneoides that, as far as I can see, is more limited, but still covers three or four species. The British list seems to confirm that we have one defined species in Balaustium murorum and possibly three that are linked to Balaustium araneoides and, as such, we treat the latter as a group.

​

I was interested to read that Balaustium araneoides was a coastal species that could be found on rocks and boulders and, indeed, on my first attempt I discovered quite a few alongside the slipway at Kimmeridge Bay, but strangely only on one side even though the habitat on the other side appeared identical.

​

Balaustium araneoides

Erythraeidae > Balaustium araneoides

Balaustium araneoides

Erythraeidae > Balaustium araneoides

Balaustium murorum

Erythraeidae > Balaustium murorum

Balaustium araneoides

Erythraeidae > Balaustium araneoides

 

I'd previously understood that they were very similar and, in many ways, they are until you realise that the first pair of legs are considerably longer. I found a paper which confirmed this fact noting that in Balaustium murorum the body length is typically around 850µm and the front pair of legs are not much longer, possibly up to a ratio of 1.4:1, but no more, whereas in Balaustium araneoides they may reach 2200µm, but with an averaged ratio of 2.3:1. Another difference is that Balaustium murorum has a much denser coat of white hairs that are distinctly longer at the rear. On a more general level, I forgot to mention that these species have a pair of simple lateral eyes that are located behind the front sensillus-bearing shield, with a small protuberance behind, which I believe is another shield.

​

 

Parasitengonine species have an interesting and somewhat involved lifecycle that obviously starts with an egg, but one that hatches into an inactive prelarva that becomes a parasitic larva, followed by a dormant inactive protonymph stage before becoming an active deutonymph, then entering another inactive spell as a tritonymph prior to completing the final phase of development when they evolve into an active predatory adult. In most cases, the larvae are parasitic on various invertebrate species, including harvestmen as seen here. Whereas the difference between the active deutonymph stage and the adult is minor, there is no similarity between the larval form and the adult, which effectively means they can't be connected. The situation creates problems with identification of certain species as they may not be fully described at the post larval stage. 

      

Mitopus morio (harvestmen) with Lepus sp. (parasitic mite larvae)

Erythraeidae > cf.Lepus sp. (known parasites of harvestmen)

bottom of page